Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Partial Birth Abortion topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Senate moves partial-birth abortion ban to third reading after constitutional debate
Summary
Senators debated first substitute SB 69, which defines and bans a procedure described on the floor as "partial-birth abortion." After discussion about medical definitions and alignment with federal and Sixth Circuit standards, the Senate voted to advance the bill to third reading, 24–3, 2 absent.
The Utah Senate on Jan. 22 debated first substitute Senate Bill 69, a measure that defines and prohibits a procedure described in the bill as "partial birth abortion." Senator Bramble, who presented the bill, read the statutory definition on the floor and said the measure would make it illegal for a physician to perform the listed procedure except where necessary to save the life of the mother.
Lawmakers engaged in extended discussion over medical terminology, constitutional exposure and whether to adopt standards used by other federal circuits or by pending federal law. Senator Dimitrych and others urged caution and preferred further study because of constitutional concerns and medical-definition ambiguity; others said the chamber should align with federal standards to streamline litigation. Senator Valentine and supporters argued the bill mirrors the federal statute under challenge and that adopting that standard would allow the state to join existing litigation to resolve matters in court.
After debate and explanations of votes, the Senate recorded 24 ayes, 3 nays and 2 absences on the motion to read the substitute bill for a third time; the measure moved to the third reading calendar for final passage consideration.
Senators noted the bill’s legal posture could result in litigation; the floor discussion repeatedly referenced the different federal-court outcomes (e.g., Carhart and Sixth Circuit precedent) and the implications of following one approach versus another.
