Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Severance Tax topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Senate approves bill to send 25% of severance tax to origin counties
Summary
First substitute SB 63 passed the Utah Senate after debate over whether returning a share of severance taxes to counties would cover local impacts from mineral extraction. Sponsors said it would reinvest funds in roads, emergency services and local infrastructure; opponents said counties already benefit from assessed value.
The Utah Senate on Feb. 24 approved first substitute Senate Bill 63, a severance-tax amendment that returns a portion of mineral extraction revenues to the county where the extraction occurs.
Sponsor Senator Evans said the change is designed to reinvest state revenues to offset local infrastructure and service burdens in areas such as the Uinta Basin, where rapid energy development has increased demands on roads, emergency medical services and county systems. Evans told colleagues the bill would "allow 25% of the severance tax back to the county of origin" to help local governments pay for those costs.
Senator Hatch and others questioned the scale of local benefit and the precise assessed-value gains counties already receive from extraction activity. Senator Stevenson argued that sending $11 million of state revenue to counties could be inappropriate when counties already receive mineral-related assessed value and community-impact funds. After debate, the first senate substitute passed on a roll-call vote (18 aye, 10 nay, 1 absent) and will be referred to the House for further action.
Supporters said the change is an investment to maintain competitiveness for the industry and help counties manage the direct costs of extraction; opponents cautioned the transfer reduces state-controlled revenue and urged careful review in subsequent stages.
