Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Convention Funding topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Convention-facility funding bill amended on floor but fails after debate over local revenue shifts
Summary
Senate debated first substitute Senate Bill 211 on Feb. 24, adopting an amendment that raised the qualifying convention-facility size from 250,000 to 350,000 sq ft but ultimately failing to pass the bill amid concerns that it would redirect local hotel and car-rental taxes to Salt Lake County; final vote was 14–11 (4 absent).
Lawmakers debated first substitute Senate Bill 211 on Feb. 24, a bill to create a funding mechanism for convention facilities including expansion of the Salt Palace. Senator Stevenson introduced Amendment 3 to change the facility-size threshold from 250,000 square feet to 350,000, arguing the change clarified which facilities should be counted and that the Salt Palace expansion is intended to attract out‑of‑state conventions.
Debate focused on which counties and facilities would be affected. Several senators from outlying counties warned the bill would effectively recapture transient room tax (TRT) and car‑rental tax revenue that currently supports local tourism promotion and bonded convention facilities. Senator Thomas and others said counties such as Davis and Weber could lose hundreds of thousands of dollars in annual revenue. Senator Jenkins raised concerns about bonded obligations in Weber County’s Echo Center and potential adverse effects.
Sponsor Senator Stevenson and Senate floor supporters said the amendment and bill were intended to target Salt Lake City projects and that the amendment’s threshold and related language would limit the effect to large facilities. After extended debate, the Senate adopted Amendment 3 on a voice vote.
When the body moved to final passage, opponents emphasized revenue shifts and fairness to counties that rely on TRT and car‑rental taxes for tourism promotion. The final roll-call vote on the amended bill returned 14 yes, 11 no with 4 absent, and the bill failed and was filed.
Action on the measure included a successful floor amendment but an unsuccessful passage vote; the Senate also discussed the mechanics of taking local general‑fund TRT dollars and recapturing car‑rental taxes based on point of sale.
Because the amendment altered which facilities would be subject to the existing municipal TRT and how municipal general‑fund TRT would be used, senators asked for technical fixes to limit application to Salt Lake County or to restore explicit county class language before advancing the bill further.
