Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Retiree Benefits topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Senate passes changes to unused sick leave retirement formula after heated debate; amendment to delay effective date fails
Summary
The Utah Senate approved House Bill 213, altering how unused sick leave is converted at retirement and directing actuarial funding for retiree health liabilities. A proposed amendment to delay the bill's effective date to July 1, 2006 failed after extended debate on obligations to current employees and budget timing.
The Utah State Senate voted to pass House Bill 213, a substantial substitute changing the valuation and treatment of unused sick leave at retirement and directing the state to address actuarial liabilities for retiree health coverage.
Sponsor Senator Evans said the bill responds to actuarial findings and Governmental Accounting Standards Board (GASB) requirements that the state measure, plan for and begin funding retiree health liabilities; the substitute package folds in a market-comparability allotment, a 2.5% COLA component and adjustments to benefits funding designed to balance commitments and budget realities.
The bill drew sharp criticism from some members who said it breached promises to long-term public employees. Senator Aaron urged colleagues to reject the bill, saying it would damage morale and felt “like the rug was pulled out from under” employees who were promised the benefit. Senator Maine moved to amend the bill to change every occurrence of the effective date from 01/01/2006 to 07/01/2006, arguing a six-month delay would allow the Legislature an interim session to seek alternatives and grandfather protections for current employees. That amendment was debated at length by senators who warned delaying the date could complicate budget accounting and jeopardize market-comparability salary adjustments that were part of the overall package.
Senator Thomas and others emphasized that the substitute contains a "program 1" grandfathering clause that preserves accrued benefits through January (they described the first banked years under the old program as vested), which helped persuade some members to support the bill. Opponents questioned whether the package fairly balanced employee promises with the state's fiscal responsibilities.
The Maine amendment was put to a roll-call and failed. The Senate then considered the substantial substitute under suspension of the rules and, after roll call, the body approved HB 213 with 20 yes votes, 8 nays and 1 absent; the bill will be returned to the House for further action.
What's next: The bill goes back to the House for concurrence on Senate amendments and to continue the budgetary and implementation work the Senate described. The act's effective dates and the actuarial schedules that the sponsor referenced will govern how the changes are implemented and what funding revisions will follow.
Quotes from the floor include Senator Aaron: "I worry about morale... If you had worked for years... and then suddenly the rug was pulled out from under you." Sponsor Senator Evans: "We've been working on this for the last two years to address this issue of the change in sick leave."
