Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Aging Policy topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Senate debates creation of Utah Commission on Aging; bill moved to third reading then tabled pending fiscal clarification
Summary
Senator Knudson presented a bill to create a two-year Utah Commission on Aging; senators discussed composition, term lengths and funding; the Senate moved the bill for third reading but later tabled it to clarify fiscal notes and funding sources.
Senators debated a proposal to create a temporary Utah Commission on Aging during floor action on Feb. 21. Senator Knudson, sponsor of House Bill 165, described the commission as a 21-member body set to sunset in two years that would study issues related to the state's rapidly growing senior population, including health services, long-term care and transportation.
"Our senior population is increasing almost twice the rate in our state as it is anywhere in the nation," Knudson said on the floor, outlining demographic pressures and the commission's intended scope. He said the Department of Human Services would provide the Commission's executive director and staff using funds from a federal social services block grant the department already receives.
Senators raised procedural and budgetary questions on the floor. One senator asked why the bill provided four-year terms for commissioners while the commission itself would sunset after two years; sponsors answered that sunsetting would truncate terms if necessary. Other members pressed on salary lines and whether the director's pay was intended to match other cabinet-level positions.
The Senate voted to read HB165 for the third time (the clerk reported 16 yes, 11 nay), but later a motion was made to table the bill pending clarification of fiscal notes and the House's concurrence on budget items; the motion to table passed and the bill was held to resolve those fiscal questions.
Next steps: HB165 is tabled pending clarification of fiscal notes and funding arrangements; sponsors said the Department of Human Services intends to fund the executive director role from an existing block grant, but the fiscal detail remained unresolved on the floor.
