Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Radioactive Waste topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Utah Senate approves ban on radioactive waste above 'A' classification and tightens oversight
Summary
The Utah Senate passed a substitute to First Substitute Senate Bill 24, banning radioactive waste with concentrations higher than Class A from being accepted or licensed in the state and directing agencies to shore up financial assurances such as letters of credit; the measure passed 26–0 and will go to the House.
The Utah State Senate voted to approve a substituted version of First Substitute Senate Bill 24, a measure that prohibits the acceptance or licensing of radioactive waste with radionuclide concentrations higher than the existing Class A threshold. Sponsor Senator Bramble said the bill reflects recommendations from a two‑year Hazardous Waste Task Force and adds tax and regulatory provisions intended to strengthen state oversight.
"What this bill does, it says that any waste that's hotter than A shall be banned from the state of Utah period," Senator Bramble said on the floor, describing the substitute's effect on licensing and commercial acceptance. He said the substitute also tightens tax policy, strengthens regulatory oversight and addresses the perpetual care fund for closure and post‑closure costs.
Supporters framed the ban as preventive public‑health and environmental policy. Senator Arendt urged colleagues to seize the moment: "This proposal does all that can be done to address our citizens' desire to keep B and C waste outside our state's borders," she said, calling the measure a way to prevent Utah from becoming the nation's dumping ground.
Several senators pressed the sponsor and agencies on how closure and post‑closure costs would be secured if companies go bankrupt. The bill retains letters of credit as a form of financial assurance but adds intent language directing regulatory agencies to review and, if necessary, revise contracts to ensure those instruments are legally enforceable for closure and post‑closure obligations. Senator Hickman and others described negotiations with industry and federal guidance to clarify that letters of credit as revised provide enforceable protection, though they noted litigation risk if collections are delayed in bankruptcy proceedings.
Senator Brown, in summation, urged that trust documents be kept consistent with federal recommendations and that the attorney general monitor bankruptcy law developments to preserve the state's security. The Senate adopted the substitute and associated intent language and recorded a roll‑call vote: first substitute SB24 passed with 26 yes votes, 0 nays and 3 absent; the bill will be transmitted to the House for further action.
What it would change: The substitute explicitly bars any entity from applying for a license to accept B & C low‑level radioactive waste or higher‑concentration radioactive waste for commercial storage or disposal in Utah, and it inserts provisions aimed at strengthening the state's authority over permitting, financial assurance, and related tax and oversight mechanisms.
Why it matters: Backers say the change codifies the state's long‑standing policy against accepting higher‑level nuclear waste and reduces the chance that future licensing or corporate changes could expose Utah to higher‑risk waste. Opponents' floor remarks focused narrowly on ensuring the state's letters‑of‑credit arrangements are legally robust in bankruptcy scenarios; no senator asked for a recorded negative vote on the ban itself during floor action.
Next steps: The measure and intent language were spread on the journal and the bill will be sent to the Utah House of Representatives for consideration.
