Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Elections topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Senate reaffirms requirement for auditable paper trail in revised electronic voting language
Summary
Senators reviewed changes to electronic voting rules in House Bill 1005, clarifying certification processes and preserving a voter-inspectable paper trail requirement while noting there are no machines currently in routine use that produce the exact paper audit standard described.
Senators reviewed amendments to the election code (House Bill 1005) that clarify the requirement for an auditable paper trail with voter inspection of the printout and specify certification processes.
Senator Bramble, explaining the substitute, said the bill requires an auditable paper trail that a voter can inspect to confirm their vote, and clarified the certification language. When Senator McCoy asked whether the clause that applies to voting equipment "certified after 01/01/2005" would exclude machines certified previously, Bramble responded that certification is performed by the lieutenant governor and that the provision does not remove the auditable-trail requirement.
The exchange addressed two practical questions: who certifies voting equipment for the state, and whether independent inspection is required only when commercial methods are reasonably practicable. Bramble emphasized the bill's intent is additional clarification rather than a material change to the election-integrity standard passed in the general session.
After questions and confirmation from the sponsor that the language preserves the auditable-voter-inspectable trail and provides clarification, the Senate advanced the bill under suspension of rules for final passage.
Next steps: House Bill 1005 will be transmitted for signature; implementation details (certification procedures and vendor capabilities) will be managed by the lieutenant governor's office and local election officials.
