Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Criminal Justice topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Utah Senate advances Drug Offender Reform Act with amendment to protect treatment funds

Utah State Senate · January 20, 2005
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The Utah Senate on Jan. 19 passed SB22 as amended, a measure aimed at expanding treatment options for nonviolent drug offenders and protecting the bill's dedicated funding; the measure passed 27–0 and was referred to the House.

The Utah Senate on Jan. 19 approved Senate Bill 22, the Drug Offender Reform Act, adopting an amendment intended to clarify treatment definitions and protect the new allocation for the program. The bill passed as amended by roll call, 27–0, and was referred to the Utah House for further action.

Senators said the measure marks a significant policy shift in how the state handles nonviolent drug offenders. The adopted amendment (amendment #1, shown under Senator Butters' name) reinserts and redefines the bill's treatment provisions and adds language the sponsor described as a safeguard to keep the new allocation available for the program rather than allowing it to be diverted to other uses.

Senator Bell, who supported the treatment-first approach, said counties must be funded to deliver counseling and other services. "They have no dollars to take this on. They're absolutely overwhelmed with their burdens as is," Bell said, pressing the Senate for a commitment that county partners would receive ongoing funding to implement the program.

The sponsor responded that the amendment creates a new allocation of dollars and does not take existing funds away from sheriffs or other county services. Supporters argued the bill would allow eligible defendants to remain in the community, keep jobs and families intact while receiving intensive treatment.

The Senate called the question on third reading and recorded 27 yes votes, 0 nays and 2 absences. The measure will be transmitted to the House for consideration.

The next procedural step is House consideration; the Senate record does not specify House referral committee or any fiscal notes in debate.