Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Hb109 Food Tax topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Senate approves phased reduction in state sales tax on food, amid debate on fiscal impact
Summary
The Senate passed a first substitute to cut part of the state sales tax on food (phase-in) and set a $6 million implementation fund; proponents said it helps families, opponents warned of bond-rating and small-business impacts. The vote was recorded 22–5 with 2 absent.
Get email alerts on the Hb109 Food Tax topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
On Feb. 28 the Utah Senate approved a first-substitute version of House Bill 109, a measure that reduces the state sales tax on certain food items in a phased approach and creates an implementation fund to help vendors reprogram systems.
Senator Wadhams, sponsor on the floor, said the bill does not completely eliminate the sales tax on food but "goes partway," reducing the state portion and establishing a $6,000,000 fund at the Tax Commission for vendor programming. He told colleagues the full fiscal note previously shown at $6,150,000 had been corrected to $6,000,000.
Several senators raised fiscal concerns. Senator Thomas, referencing bond-rating implications, warned that reducing the tax base while lowering rates could endanger the state’s bond ratings. Senators Hatch and Hallowell warned of potential harm to small businesses and expressed policy objections. Supporters framed the bill as providing direct relief to households to pay for necessities.
After extended debate, the Senate recorded first-substitute passage of HB109 by a vote the clerk announced as 22 yes, 5 nay, with 2 absent. The bill will be returned to the House for its further action and any required enrollment steps.
Key fiscal numbers discussed on the floor: sponsor cited an implementation fund of $6,000,000 held at the Tax Commission and a 2007 appropriation line previously noted at $6,150,000 but corrected to $6,000,000; the transcript also records the sponsor saying the phase-in would reduce the state rate and vendors would continue to collect the existing combined rate until programming is changed.
