Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Reproductive Policy topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Senate passes parental-notification and consent measure for minors after prolonged debate
Summary
After hours of amendments and argument, the Utah Senate passed the first substitute to House Bill 85 — a parental-notification and consent statute for abortions involving minors — sending the bill back to the House with Senate amendments (28 yes, 1 nay).
Get email alerts on the Reproductive Policy topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Utah Senate approved the first substitute to House Bill 85 — a measure on parental notification and consent for abortions involving minors — following hours of debate, amendments and a series of roll-call votes.
Senator Peterson, the Senate sponsor, opened general debate and framed the measure as carefully crafted to conform to judicial standards. Multiple senators offered amendments, including Senator Aaron (an internal-consistency amendment described as recommended by local counsel) and Senator McCoy (an amendment narrowing a notification bypass to cases where notification would pose a risk of abuse). The McCoy amendment, which sought a separate judicial finding to waive notification when abuse is alleged, failed on a roll-call vote. Debate repeatedly returned to the tension between protecting parental rights and protecting minors in abusive circumstances.
Senator Peterson summarized the bill as narrowly tailored and urged support; opponents and questioners pressed for assurances about judicial bypass standards, child-protection reporting, and whether certain criminal abuse findings required notification to DCFS. Proponents argued that existing safeguards (including DCFS reporting in identified abuse cases) would protect vulnerable minors.
The Senate recorded a final passage roll call: first substitute House Bill 85 passed the Senate with 28 aye votes and 1 nay vote (the transcript records the final tally as “28 yes votes, 1 nay vote”), and the bill was returned to the House with Senate amendments.
What happened on key points - Judicial bypass and abuse exceptions: Debate focused on whether a minor who previously obtained a judicial bypass should still face notification if notification would expose her to abuse; Senator McCoy’s narrower bypass proposal failed on the floor. - Medical and reporting safeguards: The text discussed mandatory DCFS notification when a minor is pregnant as a result of abuse, and the sponsor said DCFS notification provisions remained in the bill.
Next steps: Because the measure was amended in the Senate, it will return to the House for further action; the House may accept the Senate changes, further amend the bill, or request a conference committee.
