Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Hb90 Hate Crimes topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Senate passes substitute House Bill 90, focusing enhancements on community harm from hate-motivated offenses

Utah Senate · March 1, 2006
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

After extended floor debate, the Senate passed substitute House Bill 90 to increase certain misdemeanor penalties and add an aggravating-factor sentencing provision tied to public harm from hate-motivated offenses; the vote was 29–0 in favor as recorded on the floor.

The Utah Senate on Feb. 28 passed substitute House Bill 90, a measure that adjusts penalties for certain hate-motivated offenses and adds a sentencing aggravator that directs judges and the Board of Pardons to consider the public harm resulting from such offenses.

Senator Karen Hale, presenting the substitute, said the bill avoids imposing new felony penalties and instead raises misdemeanor offenses by one level while authorizing the Board of Pardons and sentencing judges to treat the hate-motivated aspect of an offense as an aggravating factor. "This moves the focus from the cause of the crime . . . to the impact it has on the community," the sponsor said on the floor, describing language the group took from U.S. Supreme Court phrasing to emphasize the measure’s concern with public harm.

Senators on both sides described the bill as the result of broad consultation, including with prosecutors, law-enforcement officials and legal scholars. Senator Hale told colleagues the bill "creates an aggravating factor to be considered at sentencing" including the extent the offense is likely to "incite community unrest or cause members of the community to reasonably fear for their physical safety or to freely exercise or enjoy any right secured by the constitution or laws."

Several senators spoke in support and recounted community reasons for backing the measure. Senator Wadhams and others described a long effort to find consensus language. After debate the Senate called the question and recorded final passage. The clerk announced substitute HB90 had received 29 yes votes and 0 nay votes and returned the measure to the House for the speaker's signature.

The bill narrows the procedural leap to felony penalties and concentrates on sentencing considerations that account for community impact; it also removes a predefined list of protected groups in favor of language focused on the effect of the offense. The measure will next be returned to the House for the speaker’s signature before enrollment.