Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Public Employee Health topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Utah Senate rejects bill to require high-deductible savings plan option for public employees
Summary
After extended debate over long-term fiscal impacts and employee choice, the Utah Senate voted against House Bill 76, which would have required the Public Employees Health Program (PEHP) to offer a high-deductible plan with a health savings account option to state workers.
The Utah Senate on Feb. 24 rejected House Bill 76, a proposal to require the Public Employees Health Program to offer a high-deductible health plan with an associated health savings account option for public employees.
Senator Jenkins, the bill sponsor, said the measure would add a high-deductible option to the menu of plans available to public employees, noting the plan limits mid‑year switching and aims to let workers accumulate savings over a career. "The idea is, after 30 or 40 years with your employer to have a pile of cash when you get done," Jenkins said.
Opponents warned the bill lacked sufficient study and could shift costs. Senator Evans said he was "uncomfortable" with moving forward without analysis of the long-range ramifications and potential cost shifts if many employees migrated to the option. Senator Maine raised concerns that migration out of the current pool could increase costs for remaining participants and strain the state budget.
Supporters framed the measure as expanding consumer choice. Senator Christiansen said health savings accounts have grown in the private sector and would allow PEHP members additional options without forcing anyone to choose them.
The Senate called the question and held a roll-call vote. After an initial tally and a subsequent correction, the president announced that H.B. 76 had received 10 yes votes and 15 nay votes with 4 absent; the bill failed and will be filed.
