Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the State Legislation topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Utah Senate approves payday-lending overhaul and expands tools for tollway projects after heated debate
Summary
On Feb. 14, 2006, the Utah Senate passed a second-substitute payday-lending reform (SB76) after contentious debate over a $1,000-per-violation penalty and potential impact on servicemembers, and approved legislation to allow public-private partnerships for tollway projects (SB80) amid debate over foreign ownership and property acquisition; multiple consent-calendar bills also passed.
Get email alerts on the State Legislation topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
SALT LAKE CITY — The Utah Senate on Feb. 14 advanced a string of bills, including a narrowly approved overhaul of payday-lending rules and a measure to facilitate public-private partnerships for toll roads, as senators debated consumer protections, regulatory penalties and long-term ownership of transportation infrastructure.
The chamber passed second substitute Senate Bill 76, a lenders-registration and payday-lending overhaul that sponsors said reflects eight months of negotiation among industry, consumer groups and regulators. The bill passed 15–12 with 2 absent after senators expressed sharply different views about the law’s likely effects and the size of the penalties it imposes.
Supporters, led on the floor by sponsor Senator Maine, said the bill represents compromise language that improves oversight and had buy-in from interested parties, including the state Department of Financial Institutions and some consumer advocates. "The stakeholders were all part of the discussion, all part of the negotiation and mediation over this 8-month period of time," Maine said, arguing the bill provides needed regulatory tools.
Opponents pressed two main points: that a $1,000-per-violation maximum penalty is excessive compared with typical transaction revenue and that the measure could unintentionally harm consumers who use short-term credit, including active-duty service members. Senator Bramble noted financial figures suggesting per-loan revenue of roughly $10–$15 and called a $1,000 penalty "extraordinarily high" for relatively minor paperwork violations. Senator Thomas, citing his experience representing an area with a large military population, said he was concerned about the bill’s impact on servicemembers who use payday loans in emergencies.
Senator Stevenson, citing external research, warned against overregulation and quoted a Federal Reserve economist’s view that not all payday lending is inherently predatory, but acknowledged the bill was likely to pass and urged scrutiny of unintended consequences.
The Senate also approved Senate Bill 80, which authorizes public-private partnerships for tollway facilities and creates a tollway-restricted account structure. Debate on SB80 centered on whether private and foreign entities should be allowed to participate and how ownership and land acquisition would work. Senator Maine offered an amendment to favor U.S.-domiciled companies; the amendment failed. Sponsor Senator Kilpack said the state would retain ownership of any road the department procures and that private partners could contribute additional funds under negotiated agreements. The bill passed 19–7.
The floor session included several other notable actions: the adoption of a conference committee report on House Bill 16 (revisions to the open-meetings law) passed unanimously and was referred back to the House; numerous consent-calendar measures (including HB308 on insurance-policy technical corrections, HB27 on divorce-education amendments, HB37 on simplified reporting for workforce services, and HB105 on Medicaid drug-reimbursement flexibility) were approved by unanimous or near-unanimous votes; and technical amendments were adopted on SB173 (licensure background-check clarifications) that changed permissive language to mandatory language in specific lines before the bill passed.
What’s next: Most bills passed by the Senate were referred to the House for further action; SB76 and SB80 will continue through the legislative process where committee review and potential amendments are possible.
—Byline omitted per transcript-based reporting
