Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Child Support topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Senate advances revised child support guidelines after extended debate and a series of amendments
Summary
Senate Bill 195 updates Utah’s child support tables and rules to comply with federal review, raises low‑income support amounts in places, extends tables to higher incomes, and adds transitional protections for existing orders; a sequence of amendments passed before final third‑reading action.
Senate Bill 195, a broad revision of the state’s child support guidelines, received an extended floor presentation and multiple amendments before the Senate read it for a third time.
Sponsor Senator Bell told colleagues the guidelines had not been materially updated since 1994 and that federal requirements compel a review every four years. The bill revises low‑income support tables (for example, raising combined‑income brackets in some low categories), extends the guideline tables from a $10,000 combined‑income cap up to $20,000, and adjusts percentages for one‑child schedules that sponsors described as ‘‘artificially low.’’ Bell said the committee proposed smoothing recommended economic models to avoid steep immediate increases for some families.
Senator Hilliard offered several substantive amendments designed to protect stability for existing divorce orders and limit sudden litigation. Among the adopted changes: transitional rules that generally preserve pre‑existing orders (orders entered before a specified effective date remain governed by the prior guidelines except in specified circumstances), the imposition of a 25 percent threshold for table‑driven modifications to limit immediate mass modification requests, and clarifications about allocation of childcare and medical expenses.
Debate included concerns that large increases would burden noncustodial parents, while sponsors and supporters argued the existing tables lacked an economic basis and undercounted the costs of supporting some families. Senator Bell said the committee sought to balance child welfare with fairness to noncustodial parents by limiting how and when the new tables could be used to reopen existing orders.
Several amendment votes were taken on the floor (the transcript records divided motions and multiple points of order), and the Senate ultimately read the bill for third time with adopted amendments. The floor recorded a final tally on the motion to read for a third time as 27 aye, 0 nay, 2 absent; subsequent final passage roll call also recorded passage with the amended bill and referred it back to the House for further action.
