Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Water Infrastructure topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Senate authorizes initial participation in Lake Powell Pipeline planning, stops short of funding
Summary
Senators approved a bill authorizing the Board of Water Resources to participate in planning and early work for the Lake Powell Pipeline but the measure does not appropriate construction funds; sponsors and floor members debated cost escalation risks and local repayment obligations.
Get email alerts on the Water Infrastructure topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Utah Senate moved Senate Bill 27 to third reading on Jan. 17 after extended floor discussion about a long‑range water project that would link Lake Powell to Washington and Kane counties.
Sponsor Senator Orrin Hatch told colleagues the measure ‘‘allows the state to go ahead and build the Lake Powell Pipeline’’ in the sense of authorizing the Board of Water Resources to participate in planning and early steps; he stressed the bill ‘‘doesn’t authorize any funds’’ and that actual construction and financing would depend on later appropriations and contract arrangements.
Hatch described the project as a multiyear effort requiring environmental mitigation and right‑of‑way acquisition and said the Board has about 70,000 acre‑feet of unappropriated water; he said the bill contemplates allocating roughly 69,000 acre‑feet to the Washington County Water Conservancy District and an additional 10,000 acre‑feet to Kane County, with possible Central Iron County participation subject to securing rights.
Several senators pressed the sponsor about fiscal risk and local obligations. Senator Hilliard warned of cost escalation and urged local agencies to understand repayment obligations rather than assuming the state will carry costs forever. Senator Bell voiced general support for planning while urging inclusion in subsequent financing debates.
Hatch said the bill is a framework to allow participation and early action and that funding mechanisms would be the subject of later, separate legislation.
The motion to read SB 27 for the third time passed on roll call; the clerk recorded an affirmative vote and the bill was placed on the third‑reading calendar.
