Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Water Infrastructure topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Utah Senate Approves Bill Authorizing State Role in Lake Powell Pipeline
Summary
The Utah Senate passed SB 27 authorizing state participation in the Lake Powell Pipeline project, with sponsors saying construction and preconstruction costs will be repaid to the Board of Water Resources; senators questioned potential interstate participation and groundwater impacts.
The Utah Senate on Jan. 17 passed Senate Bill 27, authorizing state involvement in construction and development of the Lake Powell Pipeline, a proposed project to move Colorado River water into southwestern Utah.
Sponsor Senator Orrin Hatch (presenting the bill) said the measure authorizes the state to participate in building the pipeline and includes provisions ensuring the Board of Water Resources would be repaid for preconstruction and construction costs, including interest. "All of those costs will be repaid to the board of water resources," Hatch said in floor remarks, urging colleagues to study section 404 for details on repayment and reimbursement.
Why it matters: proponents say the pipeline is intended to address long‑term water needs for Washington, Kane and Iron counties in southwestern Utah. Opponents and some questioners raised concerns about interstate effects and local aquifers.
Key debate and clarifications: Senator Trevor Davis asked whether any portion of the water authorized by SB 27 could be allocated to Arizona or Nevada. Hatch replied, "There is nothing in this bill that would allocate any portion of this water to any other state," but added that out‑of‑state entities could participate in the project if they negotiated access or right‑of‑way, and that participation would require those entities to secure their own water rights. On concerns about Nevada groundwater, Hatch said the issues involve different basins and are "entirely independent" of the Lake Powell Pipeline as drafted.
Vote and procedural outcome: The bill was placed on third reading and passed the Senate by roll call; the chair reported the final tally as 28 yes, 0 nay, with 1 absent. The bill will be referred to the Utah House of Representatives for further action.
Next steps: With Senate passage, the measure moves to the House. Further details on financing, permitting, environmental review and any intergovernmental agreements would be worked out during subsequent committee consideration and in implementing actions if the bill becomes law.
