Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Family Law Child Support topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Senate narrowly approves revised child-support guidelines after extended floor debate
Summary
After hours of floor debate, the Utah Senate passed Second Substitute Senate Bill 23 to revise state child-support tables, including a sizable increase in the single-child table; the measure passed 18–11 following contested floor statements.
The Utah Senate passed Second Substitute Senate Bill 23, a package of changes to the state's child-support guidelines, after extended floor debate over the law’s economic assumptions and distributional effects.
Sponsor Senator Bell urged passage, saying the guidelines had not been updated since 1994 and that consultant-recommended changes (including large increases in the one-child table) needed to be moderated in statute. "We have not adjusted these tables since 1994," Bell said, noting the committee reduced a consultant recommendation of up to 55 percent in the one-child table to a lower increase of about 25 percent in the version brought to the floor.
Opponents argued the changes would unduly burden lower-income payers and criticized the methodology. Senator Wadhams read and summarized handouts that, he said, showed the study assumes costs based on married-household spending and ignores the additional duplicate household costs divorced parents face. Senator Griner said the sliding-scale increases could push some low-income households past a breaking point and said she could not support the bill without better protections for the lowest-income families.
Supporters responded that the guidelines preserve judicial discretion — "the guidelines are guidelines," Bell said — and that the tables would reduce litigation over inconsistent local rulings. Following debate and procedural motions, the Senate recorded a roll-call vote of 18 yes, 11 no; the bill passed and was referred to the House for further action.
The floor debate highlighted competing priorities: short-term impacts on household cash flows versus the legislature’s stated goal to align support schedules with contemporary costs and reduce court burden. Senators said a further study group would continue to examine parent-time and related issues in the interim.
Action: Second Substitute Senate Bill 23 passed the Senate (18 yes, 11 no) and was sent to the House for its action.
