Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Children Health topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Utah Senate Approves Changes to Medical Recommendations for Children After Floor Amendment
Summary
The Utah Senate on Feb. 14, 2007 passed House Bill 202, which clarifies statutory language on in-school medical recommendations for children; senators adopted a floor amendment to remove ambiguous parenthetical text and the measure passed 19-10 and was returned to the House.
The Utah State Senate on Feb. 14 passed House Bill 202, a measure that clarifies how medical recommendations for children are treated in school settings, after adopting a floor amendment meant to resolve conflicting provisions.
Sponsor Senator Butters moved an amendment on the floor that struck the parenthetical letter “f” around a subsection on line 68, saying the change “makes it clear that the whole of paragraph 2 governs” and resolves a conflict between permissive and prohibitory language in the statute. The amendment passed on a voice vote and remained part of the bill when the Senate took the final roll call.
Supporters described the bill as a correction to statutory text and said it would help remove ambiguity about which provisions control. Senator Wadhams, who spoke in favor, said the bill would check inappropriate classroom prescribing and urged trust in teachers’ roles: “They need to get out in front of the TV, quit using the video games, and get a little exercise,” he said, arguing many children would benefit from nonmedical interventions.
Opponents expressed concern that the measure could limit options for children who depend on medical recommendations; floor debate showed differing views among senators about balancing parental, educational and medical roles. Senator Eastman spoke from his experience on a local board of education and said he supported the bill’s intent to address past problems with classroom prescribing.
On final passage the bill received 19 yes votes and 10 no votes, with no absences recorded in the official tally reported on the floor. The Senate returned the amended bill to the House for further action.
The floor record shows the Senate explicitly debated the drafting change that the amendment addressed; the roll-call readout in the transcript contained some transcription inconsistencies when individual names were read aloud. The final numerical tally above matches the Senate’s announced result at adjournment.
