Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Commercial Law topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Senate amends and advances bill to strengthen sales-representative commission protections

Utah State Senate · January 30, 2007
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Senate Bill 126, intended to protect independent manufacturers' representatives from nonpayment and clarify enforcement remedies, was amended on the floor to exclude automobile-sales employees and then advanced to third reading. Sponsors emphasized small-business impacts and the need for clearer remedies for unpaid commissions.

Senators adopted floor amendments and advanced Senate Bill 126, a bill aimed at clarifying and strengthening protections for manufacturers' representatives and their ability to collect commissions.

Sponsor Senator Kilpack introduced Amendment No. 2 (dated 01/29/2007) to narrow and clarify who the bill targets, noting that small manufacturers' representatives and independent contractors in Utah depend on commissions for their businesses. The Senate adopted that amendment.

Senator Eastman offered a further clarifying amendment to exclude individuals licensed under Title 41, Chapter 3, part 2 (automobile-sales licenses) and to adjust related statutory references; the amendment was accepted by the sponsor as friendly and adopted. Senator Kilpack described the legislation as preventing unfair nonpayment to representatives who often support families and run small independent businesses: "As a small business person owning my own business as a manufacturer's representative, I have 10 families I am responsible for as employer," he said, explaining the economic stakes for representatives who depend on timely commissions.

Floor sponsors and proponents said the bill was not intended to reach W‑2 employees or small local manufacturers with low-ticket items; instead it targets situations where out-of-state principals and in-state representatives lack an enforceable remedy. With amendments adopted, the Senate advanced SB 126; the floor recorded 24 yes votes, 0 no votes, and 5 absentees, moving the bill toward third reading.

The measure aims to strengthen private remedies and clarify the legal reach of commission-collection protections for independent sales representatives while excluding certain categories such as automobile salespeople.