Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Public Lewdness topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Senate passes amended public-lewdness measure making third conviction a felony, tying registry consequences to felony status

Utah Senate · March 12, 2009
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The Utah Senate adopted amendments to House Bill 384 to coordinate it with a related bill and voted to make public lewdness a felony on a third conviction; senators debated scope, juvenile exposure, and whether registry placement or longer incarceration is the appropriate repeat-offender response.

The Utah Senate on March 12 adopted an amended version of House Bill 384 that makes public lewdness a felony on a third conviction and coordinates penalty language with a companion measure from the House. Senator Urquhart, the Senate sponsor, said the coordinating clause makes this bill’s provisions govern when both chambers pass different versions: "the provisions of this bill would govern, meaning that lewdness would be a felony on the third conviction."

Supporters framed the change as a tool to respond to repeated, crude public sexual conduct that endangers community safety. "By the third conviction ... we have very crude behavior that does require some serious reaction on behalf of the state," Urquhart said, urging colleagues to focus on repeat offenders rather than isolated youthful misbehavior.

Opponents warned the bill could produce unintended consequences for minors and for people who commit less serious acts. Senator McCoy described the committee compromise reached earlier in the session and urged caution: "What we came to in the committee was ... the first two are Class B misdemeanors, the third is a Class A misdemeanor, and the fourth is a felony" with registry implications. McCoy and others argued that increasing registry exposure risks lifelong collateral consequences for conduct that, in some cases, may involve adolescents or context-specific acts such as transient exposure or consensual behavior.

Senators questioned several specifics: whether acts must be in person (sponsors said the statute applies to in-person conduct and that online sexting is addressed under other laws), whether multiple victims at a single event produce multiple convictions for enhanced penalties (sponsors clarified that repeated convictions require subsequent separate offenses), and how prosecutors apply scarce resources to petty offenses. Senator Madsen and others asked whether the statute would unintentionally sweep in cases such as exhibitionary conduct among teens; sponsors answered that prosecutorial discretion and the requirement for convictions, not arrests, make frivolous registry placements unlikely.

The Senate adopted a coordination amendment to resolve conflict with a House bill that would impose a felony at the fourth conviction; the coordination clause makes the third-conviction felony language govern if both measures pass. After extended floor debate, the Senate passed the amended bill by roll call (24 yea, 0 nay, 5 absent). The bill will return to the House for its further action and any necessary reconciliations.

This vote follows earlier discussion in the judiciary committee and reflects an ongoing tension in state lawmaking between tougher penalties for repeated sexual offenses and safeguards against disproportionate long-term consequences for lower-level or youthful misconduct.

The Senate record shows the principal proponents were Senator Urquhart (sponsor) and Senator Eckhart (mover); prominent floor critics included Senator McCoy and Senator Romero. The measure was amended on the floor and voted under suspension of the rules.

Next steps: the measure returns to the House for further action or conference if the chambers remain at variance.