Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Criminal Justice topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Senate Adopts Constitutional Amendment Proposal to Limit Post-Conviction Challenges

Utah State Senate · March 2, 2009
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The Utah Senate approved Senate Joint Resolution 14, a proposed constitutional amendment aimed at narrowing post-conviction remedies and preserving legislative authority over capital-punishment policy; supporters said it restores legislative intent, opponents said the language is overbroad and urged delay for further review.

The Utah Senate on Feb. 27 adopted Senate Joint Resolution 14, a proposed constitutional amendment that would limit the scope of post‑conviction challenges and affirm legislative authority over the application of capital punishment. Senator Bramble, who sponsored the measure, said the amendment “brings back into effect the death penalties in the state of Utah” and seeks to reinstate legislative policy where courts have declined to follow statutory post‑conviction remedies.

Supporters argued the amendment addresses delays and perceived gaps in the current post‑conviction process. Senator Grama urged colleagues to support the measure as restoring balance between victims’ families and constitutional protections. Bramble also moved and the Senate adopted intent language making clear the amendment would apply to pending cases if enacted.

Opponents — including Senator McCoy and Senator O’Meara — said the resolution is overbroad and urged more time for study. McCoy said he did not necessarily oppose an amendment to the constitution on this subject but objected to the current form, which he described as not “fine tuned” and potentially sweeping beyond capital cases. O’Meara said the Constitutional Revision Commission has been working on the matter and urged delaying placement on the ballot to allow further refinement.

After debate and adoption of the intent language, the Senate recorded its vote and advanced the resolution to the next step for House consideration. The resolution’s procedural language states that, if enacted, the amendment would govern pending cases and limit challenges to the scope provided by statute, subject to the exceptions enumerated in the proposed Article I, Section 30, Subsection 2.