Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Housing Fit Premises topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Senate advances Fit Premises Act with amendment adding dangerous-condition timelines and domestic-violence provisions
Summary
After extended floor debate and negotiated changes, the Senate adopted Amendment No. 3 to First Substitute Senate Bill 45 (Fit Premises Act), adding a 24-hour remedial-action requirement for ‘dangerous conditions’ and new language addressing domestic-violence situations; the amended bill was placed for third reading.
Get email alerts on the Housing Fit Premises topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Utah Senate on Day 28 adopted a key amendment to First Substitute Senate Bill 45, known as the Fit Premises Act amendments, after extended floor debate that focused on tenant protections, municipal authority and new domestic-violence language.
Amendment No. 3, presented by Senator Mike McAdams, distinguishes “dangerous conditions” from lesser “deficient conditions” and requires that “an owner shall within 24 hours of receiving a notice of a dangerous condition, commence remedial action and diligently pursue remedial action to completion,” language McAdams read for the body. Proponents described the amendment as a negotiated compromise between stakeholders including cities, landlord groups and victim advocates.
Sponsor Wayne Niederhauser told colleagues the amendment reflects stakeholder input and carve-outs negotiated with the League of Cities and Towns and the Apartment Association. Niederhauser said the bill creates a statewide minimum standard while preserving some municipal flexibility in specified carve-outs.
Opponents raised concerns about the state’s role in local zoning and rental regulation. Senator Bramble questioned whether the measure represented the state “injecting ourselves” into affairs traditionally handled by municipalities and worried about impacts on property owners’ rights. Several senators sought clarity on how the bill would interact with existing municipal ordinances and business-license regimes.
Advocates for strengthening the domestic-violence language urged the inclusion of more readily accessible evidence beyond protective orders, noting that protective orders are obtained in only about half of domestic-violence cases. Senator Robles, identifying experience as an advocate, said survivors often avoid formal orders and urged greater openness to citation or arrest records as proof when necessary.
Senators described the amendment as a trade among stakeholders: cities sought carve-outs, landlords sought predictable time frames and advocates sought protections for victims. Senator McAdams said the amendment is the result of “a coalition of a broad group of stakeholders who have come to the table.”
The chamber adopted Amendment No. 3 (as recorded in the floor transcript) and the first substitute to Senate Bill 45 was placed at the bottom of the third-reading calendar with the vote recorded in the transcript as 24 in favor, 8 opposed and 1 absent.
Next steps: the bill, with the newly adopted amendment, will be scheduled for third reading and final passage consideration. If approved, the measure would set a minimum statewide standard for residential rental unit fitness while retaining specific exceptions for municipalities that meet the carve-out criteria.
