Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Education Reading Policy topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Senate moves reading-requirement bill to third reading after debate on remediation and equity

Utah State Senate · March 1, 2010
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

SB150 would require first–third graders to meet a minimal reading standard to advance, mandate midyear notice to families and provide focused remediation; senators debated funding, exemptions for students with disabilities and limited English proficiency and signaled amendment plans.

The Senate voted to move Senate Bill 150 (Reading Requirements for Student Advancements) to third reading after extended floor debate on funding, exemptions and implementation.

Sponsor Senator Morgan framed the bill with data: "24 percent, that's 1 in 4 of Utah's elementary school children cannot read a grade level by the end of third grade," he said, arguing that basic proficiency is the foundation for later learning. The bill would require schools to notify parents of first–third graders at the start of the year and again by midyear if a student may not qualify for promotion, provide focused remediation (tutoring, before/after-school programs or summer assistance) and allow students to demonstrate grade-level proficiency by Aug. 15 to qualify for promotion.

Senators raised questions about where remediation funding would come from. Senator Jones urged attention to resources and noted an ongoing $15 million line item for K–3 reading plus a $15 million local match, saying those funds and school land trust dollars had been directed to reading initiatives. Senator Stevenson said he planned an amendment to provide incentives so the system is responsible for delivering services rather than 'punishing' children for adults' failures.

Other issues included exemptions: the statute already exempts students with IEPs under Section 504; some senators asked whether limited-English-proficient students should be explicitly exempted and the sponsor said he was open to amendment and discussion. The body voted to place SB150 on the third reading calendar for further action.