Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Health Insurance Risk Adjuster topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Senate adopts changes to HB294, adding 3-year sunset to statewide risk-adjuster after heated debate
Summary
After hours of debate over whether to force insurers outside the exchange into a statewide risk-adjuster, the Utah Senate passed House Bill 294 as amended, adding a three-year sunset on the statewide mechanism set to take effect Jan. 1, 2013; the final vote was 23–4 with two absent.
Get email alerts on the Health Insurance Risk Adjuster topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Utah Senate passed House Bill 294 as amended on March 1, 2010, after extended floor debate over whether a statewide risk-adjuster should apply to insurers both inside and outside the state’s insurance exchange. The Senate adopted Amendment 13, which implements the statewide risk-adjuster with an effective date of Jan. 1, 2013, and automatically sunsets the mechanism three years later unless the Legislature extends it.
The bill’s sponsor, Senator Niederhauser, told colleagues the risk adjuster is intended to bring pricing parity between products sold inside the exchange and those sold outside it. "We want to keep everybody at the table and working through these differences," he said, arguing the board is made up primarily of industry representatives and is not a government "czar." He explained the measure was included as a backstop so stakeholders continue negotiating in good faith and the exchange can function across markets.
Opponents argued Amendment 10, offered earlier and defeated, would undo market choice by pulling insurers that chose not to participate in the exchange into a statewide scheme. "If somebody elects not to be in that exchange, why should they then be pulled in by government regulation?" said Senator Wadsworth, expressing free‑market concerns that mandatory participation would impose costs and disincentives. Sponsors and supporters replied the provision is designed to preserve the exchange’s functionality and that the statewide mechanism would only be used if necessary.
Senators debated technical distinctions between "risk adjustment" (which sponsors described as redistributing risk across products or carriers) and reinsurance or claims-based indemnification. Several members emphasized the risk adjuster addresses aggregate risk in the market rather than compensating individual claims. Supporters also said the amendment creating an automatic sunset balances the need for a negotiated solution with legislative oversight.
After adopting Amendment 13, the Senate voted on final passage by roll call. The clerk reported House Bill 294 had received 23 yea votes, 4 nay votes and 2 absent; the bill passed and was ordered referred to the House. The record notes a 24‑hour hold was placed on the bill for reconsideration procedures.
The most substantive issues on the floor were: whether the risk-adjuster should compel outside-market carriers to participate; the statutory distinction between risk adjustment and reinsurance; the effective date of a statewide mechanism (Jan. 1, 2013); and whether a sunset (three years) would protect against an unwanted permanent expansion of the mechanism. Proponents framed the changes as necessary to make the exchange work; opponents called for preserving voluntary participation and protecting market competition.
Next steps: HB294, as amended, will be transmitted back to the House for its consideration and implementation details — including rulemaking to reconcile statute and administrative rules — will be addressed if the House concurs and the bill becomes law.
