Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Education Reading Requirements topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Utah Senate passes reading-requirements bill after rejecting parent-stipend amendment
Summary
The Utah Senate approved Senate Bill 150, setting minimum reading requirements and remediation for grades 1–3. An amendment to create results-based parent stipends (fiscal note about $8.1 million) failed after extended debate.
Senator Morgan urged final passage of Senate Bill 150 on March 2, 2010, saying the bill addresses that "24 percent or 1 in 4 school children can't read at grade level by the end of third grade" and establishes minimum reading requirements, a safety net for struggling readers and broad exemptions for students with special concerns.
The measure's sponsor and supporters said the bill focuses schools on early reading and provides local flexibility on remediation. Senator Morgan said the bill "prevents schools from passing children from grade to grade" without providing focused help and argued it would "give help to tens of thousands of children." Opponents and amendment proponents argued for additional parent-choice measures.
Senator Stevenson offered Amendment No. 3 to create a results-based stipend for parents of below-grade-level students that could be redeemed at local schools, charter schools or private providers but would pay out only when a student reached grade-level reading. The amendment's fiscal impact was repeatedly highlighted during debate: the transcript records a fiscal analyst estimate of "$8,100,000" to implement the stipend program, and several senators said funding availability would be a constraint. Senator Maxson asked whether existing K–3 remediation funds and school trust land fund money could be repurposed to support the concept; sponsors and opponents disagreed about whether the bill as drafted already provided sufficient local flexibility.
After discussion and a standing call, the Senate rejected the amendment. The bill then received final passage on third reading; the chair announced that "Senate Bill 150, having received 18 yay votes, 8 nay votes, 3 being absent, passes" and it will be forwarded to the House.
The next procedural step is transmittal to the House; the Senate record shows no additional amendments adopted on final passage. The debate centered on tradeoffs between statewide standards and locally managed remediation and on whether a new parent-stipend program was affordable and properly drafted.
Actions recorded: final passage on third reading; amendment to add a parent stipend was offered and failed. The fiscal note for the amendment was reported as approximately $8.1 million (maker of amendment acknowledged no independent fiscal note on hand during some questions).
