Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Juvenile Justice topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Senate approves juvenile fingerprinting law after close floor amendments and division call
Summary
The Senate passed the revised bill requiring fingerprints and photographs of juveniles who meet certain criteria after a contested floor amendment to limit collection to felonies failed and the chamber later reinstated original language; senators debated privacy, fiscal impact and downstream uses of biometric records.
The Utah Senate passed the third substitute of House Bill 48 on March 9, which requires photographs and fingerprints for juveniles age 14 or older who are detained or adjudicated for offenses that would be felonies if committed by an adult. Sponsor Senator Thatcher said the measure aims to create a biometric record that can help solve older crimes and improve public safety while restricting distribution and providing destruction of records when juvenile records are expunged.
During floor debate Senator Urquhart moved to amend the bill to limit fingerprint collection strictly to felonies (and to retain photographs for felonies and Class A misdemeanors). Urquhart argued that extending fingerprint retention to Class A misdemeanors ‘‘goes a bit too far’’ and that the Senate should ‘‘ease into it’’ rather than expand biometric collection broadly for juveniles. The amendment failed on a recorded division call; later the chamber briefly circled the bill to revisit language and ultimately reinstated lines returning the bill to its original condition before final passage.
Opponents raised civil-liberties concerns and asked for confirmation that the fiscal note would not increase because of the amendment. Senator Hilliard sought assurance the amendment would not affect the small fiscal note; the sponsor and the mover said taking fewer fingerprints would not increase costs. After procedural exchanges and a final roll call, the bill passed with a recorded result (25 yeas, 4 nays; recorded as passed and signed by the President).
Supporters said retaining fingerprints for serious juvenile offenders aids law enforcement in connecting repeat offenders to older unsolved crimes; critics said the law risks normalizing biometric collection for minors and emphasized the need for narrow scope and strong privacy protections. The bill includes language restricting distribution of juvenile fingerprints and photographs and allows destruction of those records when juvenile records are expunged. The Senate returned the bill to the House for its signature.
