Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Education Policy topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Senate advances a package of education bills on concurrent enrollment, college readiness and K‑3 reading

Utah State Senate · March 5, 2012
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Senators advanced several education measures under suspension of the rules, including amendments to concurrent enrollment fees (exempting free/reduced‑price lunch students and tech‑intensive courses), a $500,000 college‑readiness assessment pilot, and K‑3 reading program technology funding caps.

The Utah Senate moved a block of education bills through the floor on March 5, 2012, approving amendments intended to preserve concurrent enrollment access while authorizing limited fee authority and advancing tools for college readiness and early reading.

Senator Margaret Dayton and Senator Angela Romero (floor presentations and amendments) and Senator Urquhart (sponsor of the concurrent‑enrollment bill) explained the tradeoffs in SB 284, which would permit institutions to charge up to $30 per credit hour for concurrent enrollment college credit while exempting students who qualify for free and reduced‑price lunch and technology‑intensive (TICE) courses. Urquhart said the fee cap is intended to protect higher‑education budgets while continuing broad free access to high school instruction: “We can impose some fees up to $30 per credit hour,” he said during debate.

Discussion focused on equity and administration: senators pressed whether Title I students should be exempted (the sponsor said individual eligibility for free/reduced lunch better targets those unable to pay) and asked the Regents/USHE to provide oversight of fee schedules to avoid damaging concurrent enrollment partnerships.

On college readiness, SB 286 (sponsored by Urquhart) proposed a $500,000 appropriation for an online diagnostic that high‑school juniors and seniors could use to identify remediation needs before they arrive on campus. The sponsor said a 20‑minute assessment could prescribe targeted coursework to close gaps in math readiness and improve college completion rates.

Separately, SB 289 (K‑3 reading program) and SB 285 (voluntary education donation checkoff paid to the general education fund) were debated; SB 285’s sponsor said a checkoff would be equitable while acknowledging donations would not be tax‑deductible in the bill’s current form.

Roll call votes recorded passage or placement for third reading for these items: SB 284 was amended and placed on the third reading calendar (vote recorded 22‑5 on one scheduled action), SB 286 passed on final vote 29–0 and SB 289/Fund measures were advanced under suspension of the rules. Sponsors said further amendments and oversight language will be considered as the bills advance to the House.

Next steps: the bills will move along legislative calendars (some to third reading within the Senate and several forwarded to the House). Sponsors asked the Regents and legislative management to collaborate on fee schedules and implementation oversight.