Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Healthcare Reform topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Senate advances third-substitute HB 144 on health system reform; actuarial analysis and autism denial protections included
Summary
The Senate passed third-substitute House Bill 144, a multi-component health system reform bill that clarifies all‑payer claims database roles, authorizes an actuarial analysis of options for a basic plan for 133–200% FPL, clarifies CHIP dental benchmark rules, and adds a prohibition on denying covered services tied to autism diagnoses; the substitute passed on roll-call 26–0 (3 absent).
The Senate advanced third-substitute House Bill 144, a comprehensive health system reform measure containing technical clarifications, new authorities for actuarial study, and protections for covered services.
On the floor, the presenter summarized primary changes: clarifying the role of the all‑payer claims database and the Utah Exchange in prospective and retrospective risk adjusting; authorizing an actuarial analysis to study whether a basic plan could provide coverage for people between 133 percent and 200 percent of the federal poverty level beginning in 2014 (an analysis only, not an authorization to implement); amending the CHIP dental benchmark plan; allowing dental and vision policies to be available on the Exchange; and permitting insurer premium discounts for employee wellness participation.
The presenter further emphasized a new substantive protection: the substitute prohibits an insurer from denying a covered service on the basis of an autism diagnosis unless the denial is directly related to autism. The presenter said the change responds to instances where unrelated treatment was denied because a diagnosis of autism appeared in records.
After substitution and presentation, the sponsor moved that the third substitute pass. The Senate recorded 26 yea votes, 0 nay votes and 3 absent; the bill will be placed on the third‑reading calendar for final action.
The substitute contains a number of technical and policy provisions that require further administrative detail (for example, specifications for the actuarial analysis and the treatment of call‑center fees for the Utah Exchange). Those implementation details will rest with state agencies and any rulemaking authorized by statute.
