Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Tax Policy topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Senate advances tax‑parity bill for cable and satellite customers after wide debate
Summary
After extended floor debate over municipal impacts and a fiscal note, the Senate approved SB112 to give cable customers a credit for franchise fees so total multichannel excise tax aligns with satellite rates; the bill passed on a roll call and was placed on the third‑reading calendar.
Get email alerts on the Tax Policy topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Senator Niederhauser introduced Senate Bill 112, a proposal to equalize the multichannel video/audio excise tax so cable and satellite customers pay comparable total tax rates. Niederhauser said the measure extends a previous 2007 credit and gives cable customers an additional credit for franchise fees so that total tax paid by consumers would be consistent across delivery platforms.
Debate focused on fiscal and municipal consequences. Senator Jones noted the bill carries a fiscal note (about $6.6 million) and warned of continued erosion of the general fund if similar tax changes accumulate. Senator Ballantine said she will offer an amendment on third reading to freeze the state credit calculation at January 1, 2012, to constrain incentives for municipalities to raise franchise fees. Senator Weiler raised concerns about uneven local franchise rates in his district and asked whether the bill could increase costs for some residents; the sponsor said the aim is parity and described the measure as a tax cut for many cable customers.
Supporters argued the bill corrects an industry‑created disparity: satellite service benefited from federal exemptions, creating a competitive advantage in tax treatment. Opponents warned of shifting revenue impacts for cities, and potential incentives for cities to negotiate higher franchise fees. After extended remarks and questions from multiple senators, the Senate passed SB112 on a roll call (24 yea, 5 nay) and placed it at the bottom of the third‑reading calendar; Senator Ballantine indicated she will move her amendment at third reading.
