Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Transportation topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Senate passes transportation funding bill that trims bonding authority and shifts registration fees
Summary
First substitute HB 377 modifies transportation bonding authority, returns $22 of vehicle registration fees to counties in some cases, and directs prioritized projects including Salt Lake County work. Supporters said the bill smooths completion of projects; critics warned it reduces bonding capacity needed for emergencies.
The Utah Senate passed first substitute House Bill 377, a transportation funding package that adjusts bonding authority, returns a portion of vehicle registration fees to counties (approximately $22 in the cited language), and prioritizes a set of projects for Salt Lake County.
Sponsor Senator Adams argued the substitute is a pragmatic response to a multi-year construction pipeline that once peaked near $3 billion and is now lower, and said a modest change in bonding authorization is appropriate to permit projects to continue without a sharp funding drop-off. "We can come down off a $3,000,000,000 program... We can see City Creek and many of the other construction projects going on that are completing," Adams said in summation, urging that the industry have a 'soft landing.' He said the substitute reduces Transportation Commission authority by about $55 million compared with prior authorization.
Senator Hilliard warned that the state should not overextend bonding capacity and that reduced bonding headroom could hamper the state's ability to respond to major emergencies such as earthquakes. "If we have a major earthquake in this state and we now have to respond... we really have no bonding capacity," Hilliard said, urging prudence on bond levels.
The bill contains two principal pieces: a $135 million prioritization under the Transportation Commission for statewide projects and a quarter-over-quarter allocation that returns local registration-fee revenue to municipalities (notably in Salt Lake County) to help maintain local B and C roads. Sponsor Adams said the bill keeps the state's bonding authorization near current levels (roughly 79%) and that the change is a small percentage point difference across the life of the bonds.
After debate and recorded explanations of votes, the Senate passed the first substitute HB 377 by roll-call; the bill will be sent to the House for further consideration.
Implementation notes
Most of the funds in the substitute are to be prioritized by the Transportation Commission; the quarter-over-quarter return is intended to augment local funds for municipal roads. The substitute also contains specific project listings for Salt Lake County under the quarter-over-quarter money.
Fiscal context and concerns
Supporters said the substitute reduces a sharp falloff in construction program activity and allows ongoing projects and contractors to continue work. Opponents cautioned that incremental increases in bonding authority year to year have left limited capacity for emergencies and urged restraint.
