Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Agriculture Environment topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Senate advances voluntary agricultural 'stewardship' certification to third reading

Utah State Senate · February 13, 2013
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Senate first substitute SB57 would create a voluntary Utah environmental stewardship certification for agricultural producers, administered by the Department of Agriculture with review by the Utah Conservation Commission and Utah Water Quality Board; the first substitute advanced to third reading by recorded vote.

Senator Oakland introduced first substitute Senate Bill 57, which would establish a voluntary Utah environmental stewardship certification program in the Department of Agriculture.

Under the proposal, agricultural producers that comply with specified best practices could apply to the Utah Conservation Commission and Utah Water Quality Board for a stewardship designation. The sponsor described the designation as valid for a 10‑year period; the floor presentation stated the program is voluntary and intended to recognize producers who protect and manage their land responsibly.

Senator Oakland said the program, once a producer meets the stewardship status, would confer certain protections from federal enforcement actions "once they meet this status," describing it as a voluntary policy tool to recognize compliance with best practices. The sponsor also emphasized the program was not mandatory and producers would only participate if they chose to apply.

The Senate moved the first substitute SB57 to third reading; roll call recorded 25 yeas, 0 nays and 4 absent. The bill was read for a third time following the favorable vote.

The floor debate emphasized the voluntary nature of the program and the state's role in administering a stewardship review process; no binding federal preemption or legal changes beyond the certification process were detailed on the floor.