Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Environmental Health Funding topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Senate declines ongoing funding for Rocky Mountain Center website; bill fails after concerns about duplication and scope

Utah State Senate · February 4, 2013
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Senate debate over SB 118, which would have funded a Rocky Mountain Center website and clearinghouse for occupational and environmental health information, centered on duplication with existing state resources and selection criteria for content. After extended floor discussion the bill failed 14–11 and was filed.

Senator Maine presented SB 118, a proposal to provide ongoing state funding to the Rocky Mountain Center for Occupational and Environmental Health to host a public clearinghouse of environmental and occupational health information. The sponsor said the center would offer an independent, "untainted" source for data and public inquiry and cited past federal grants and a requested amount in the fiscal narrative.

Several senators questioned the need for state funding, asking why a university center should maintain a second public portal when state agencies and the center already maintain online resources. Senator Dayton and others raised procedural questions about duplication of effort and whether the center's output would add value beyond Department of Environmental Quality or existing university pages. Senator Harper also asked about overlap and whether the new site would be perceived as more or less credible than current sources.

Senators pressed the sponsor on selection criteria for included research and whether outside studies would be vetted; one senator summarized the concern as whether the site would accept any externally produced research. The sponsor said the center’s researchers would curate content and respond to inquiries.

After extended debate and concern about taxpayer funding for what some described as potentially duplicated services, the Senate recorded 14 yeas, 11 nays, 4 absent and the bill failed and was filed.

The floor discussion highlighted competing views about how best to present environmental health information to the public and whether state dollars should seed a new public portal when other public and private resources exist.