Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Emergency Services Funding topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Senate debates and advances bill shifting 911 and poison control funding priorities
Summary
First Substitute Senate Bill 48 would cap and redirect portions of emergency telephone revenues to rural 911 systems and fund poison control at a specified level; senators debated fiscal impacts and whether the University of Utah would lose funding, and several asked for budget reconciliation before sending to the House.
Senators debated First Substitute Senate Bill 48, an Emergency Telephone Service Law amendment that reallocates some emergency telephone revenues between poison control centers and enhanced 911 systems. Sponsor Senator Harper said the change would provide a fair and sustainable $2.2 million allocation to the Poison Control Center to maintain core missions and outreach while directing additional funds to rural public safety answering points and to interconnect disparate radio systems.
Senator Jenkins questioned whether capping the University of Utah’s poison control fund at a set amount would create a loser if revenues decline; the sponsor responded that revenues are increasing with more cell phones and that the cap was set to preserve staffing and accreditation while channeling excess funds to rural needs. Senator Urquhart and others said they were concerned about the fiscal note and the budgetary match, with one senator asking whether the money would be restored through the budget process.
Several members offered explanations of their roll‑call votes, noting uncertainty in how the change would interact with the budget; the transcript includes recorded explanations but the roll tally as read in the excerpt is fragmented. The sponsor said the proposal was intended to balance poison control needs with broader 911 modernization in rural Utah. The bill was taken up for final passage consideration during the session.
