Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the General Assistance Funding topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Senate advances S.B. 42 to keep SSI reimbursements in General Assistance fund, despite appropriations concerns

Utah State Senate · February 27, 2015
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

S.B. 42 redirects reimbursements related to SSI determinations directly into Utah’s General Assistance fund so the dollars do not lapse to the general fund; sponsor and supporters argued it stabilizes a tiny but vital program, while the appropriations chair said she would vote no because it grows fund resources outside usual appropriation controls.

Senator Escamilla told the Senate S.B. 42 aims to change where federal reimbursements tied to General Assistance (GA) recipients are deposited so those reimbursements go directly to GA instead of the general fund.

"The reimbursements to the state for general assistance advance to an applicant while awaiting the determination of the federal supplemental security income ... will now be used by the general assistance program," Escamilla said. He told colleagues the change is largely technical but would keep intended dollars from lapsing back to the general fund during year-end appropriations processes.

Supporters described GA as a small, targeted program that provides limited monthly benefits ("The maximum monthly benefit for a GA is $287 a month for an individual and $398 for a married couple," Escamilla said) and argued the change prevents those federal reimbursements from being lost through timing or budgeting mechanics. Senator Jenkins urged compassion, describing GA as a last-resort program that helps people secure a room when they have no other support.

Appropriations Chair Christiansen said the substitute would effectively grow the GA fund outside the standard appropriation process and stated she would vote no for that procedural reason, leaving the matter to budget negotiations.

On the floor the second substitute was approved and ordered to third reading with an announced tally on the record; floor announcements of counts were used to determine disposition.

Next steps: S.B. 42 was advanced to be read for a third time; if enacted the Department of Workforce Services would administer the redirected reimbursements and the Legislature's appropriation process could be expected to include implementation detail.