Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Elections topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Senate rejects substitute to delay election-law changes after heated floor debate
Summary
After extended floor debate about the impact of SB 54 on party nomination processes, the Utah Senate voted 19-9 to defeat the first substitute to SB 43, which sought to delay implementation of earlier election-law changes beyond the 2016 cycle.
The Utah Senate on the morning calendar rejected a first substitute to Senate Bill 43 — a measure related to the implementation of prior election-law changes — after a sustained floor debate about who should decide how political parties govern their nominations.
Senator Jenkins, sponsor of the substitute, said the proposal sought only to "delay this so that we can put our house in order" and asked colleagues to give party leaders time to convene and decide whether to be a "registered" or "qualified" political party. Jenkins argued the motion was limited in scope and urged patience while litigation over SB 54 runs its course.
Opponents said the change was unnecessary because state election officials and the attorney general had offered legal opinions that parties could comply by submitting a simple letter to the Elections Office. "54 is the law. It's bad law, but it is the law," said Senator Madsen during floor remarks, capturing the view of senators who opposed the delay.
Senator Weiler and other senators asked sponsors to identify specific party bylaws that would need to change to comply; sponsors replied that the party itself must decide whether to be a "registered" or "qualified" party and that the internal party process — not a single executive letter — is the concern driving the request for delay.
After debate and multiple exchanges between sponsors and members, the Senate recorded a roll-call vote that defeated the first substitute to SB 43: 9 yea, 19 nay, 1 absent. The clerk recorded the outcome and the measure was sent to staff for filing.
What happens next: Because the substitute failed on the floor, the underlying legal and administrative questions about implementing SB 54 remain unresolved on the Senate floor. Sponsors said party leadership may continue to seek guidance and pursue litigation; opponents said the statutory process and election-office guidance should govern implementation going forward.
