Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Economic Development topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Utah Senate advances several bills, including CDA changes that shorten notice period
Summary
On Feb. 10 the Utah Senate passed multiple bills on third reading and the consent calendar, including First Substitute House Bill 41 (shortening some community development area notice/hearing steps while restricting incentives to new, non-retail primary industries), First Substitute House Bill 70 (posting political signs), and other consent items; vote tallies recorded in the session minutes.
Get email alerts on the Economic Development topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Utah Senate completed a busy morning calendar on Feb. 10, approving multiple bills on the consent calendar and on third reading.
Among the measures the chamber passed was First Substitute House Bill 41, a package of changes to community development area (CDA) procedures. The sponsor told senators the bill removes one public-hearing step and shortens the process for adopting or amending a CDA project-area plan—saying the change could shorten formation timelines by roughly 30 to 45 days—while also restricting the incentive program to primary (non-retail) industries, requiring affected property owners’ written consent, and making incentives contingent on a company’s prior presence and tax payments in the state.
Senator Dayton asked the sponsor to explain a provision (starting on the lines the senator cited) that appeared to remove a notice-and-hearing requirement; the sponsor responded that the change shortens the timeline but does not eliminate public input, noting the bill retains a public hearing that must be published (the sponsor characterized prior notice requirements and the new, shorter schedule). Dayton said he was "glad to know the public still has input." Senator Jenkins and others said they supported the bill as drafted. The Senate passed the first substitute of House Bill 41 by roll call (recorded as 26 yea, 1 nay, 2 absent).
Other bills considered and passed that morning included: Senate Bill 136 (victim restitution orders made nondischargeable in bankruptcy; recorded as passing with 24 yea, 0 nay, 5 absent), First Substitute Senate Bill 141 (judiciary amendments on the consent calendar; recorded as 23 yea, 0 nay, 6 absent), and First Substitute House Bill 70 (posting political signs on public property; recorded as 27 yea, 0 nay, 2 absent).
Sponsor remarks emphasized economic development goals: the bill sponsor told senators the amendments help government entities and local economic-development officials move quickly to attract new primary industries to parts of the state that need jobs. The sponsor also said the bill excludes retail businesses from receiving the incentives in this provision.
What happens next: The bills that passed the Senate were recorded for transmittal to the House or for enrollment as noted in the Senate proceedings; where the Senate recorded unanimous or near-unanimous votes, the session noted the tallies and that bills will be sent to the House for consideration or enrollment as appropriate.
Vote-at-a-glance (selected items recorded in the Senate minutes):
First Substitute House Bill 41 (community development area procedural changes): 26 yea, 1 nay, 2 absent — passed.
First Substitute House Bill 70 (posting political signs on public property): 27 yea, 0 nay, 2 absent — passed.
Senate Bill 136 (restitution orders nondischargeable): 24 yea, 0 nay, 5 absent — passed.
First Substitute Senate Bill 141 (judiciary amendments on consent calendar): 23 yea, 0 nay, 6 absent — passed.
