Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Workplace Accommodations topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Utah Senate concurs with House on workplace lactation protections and advances multiple bills

Utah State Senate (2016 General Session) · February 29, 2016
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The Utah Senate moved and concurred with a House substitute to First Substitute Senate Bill 59, clarifying employer obligations to accommodate milk expression and addressing business concerns; the body also cleared a slate of consent‑calendar bills, sending them to the House for signature.

The Utah Senate on the floor on Thursday agreed to a House substitute to First Substitute Senate Bill 59, a workplace anti‑discrimination measure that includes accommodations for employees who need to express breast milk. Senator Warner, speaking in favor of concurrence, said the substitute clarifies that an employer must accommodate "the ability to express milk" but does not require permitting the child in the workplace and added fixes requested by business groups.

Lawmakers voted to concur. First Substitute Senate Bill 59 passed the concurrence calendar and will be transmitted to the House for the speaker's signature; the floor record shows the Senate recorded the action as 23 yeas, 2 nays and 4 absent on the concurrence motion.

The Senate also moved a large group of bills on the consent calendar with relatively little debate. Among those passed and sent to the House were House Bill 245 (local health department amendment allowing permissive colocations of county health and mental‑health services), House Bill 142 (agency auditing procedures for education) and House Bill 118 (public access of administrative action amendments). Senator Christiansen explained HB 245 as permissive authorization counties can choose to use; the President directed the unanimous vote and the bill passed with a recorded floor note of 26 yeas, 0 nays, 3 absent.

Other consent items cleared the floor after brief sponsor presentations or unanimous voice votes. Several technical or non‑substantive changes to statutes were placed on the consent list and moved forward without roll‑call debate.

The bills now move to the House for their next procedural step or to the speaker for signature where appropriate.