Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Education After School topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Senate defeats after‑school programs bill after heated debate
Summary
After extended debate over funding, scope and overlap with existing programs, the Utah Senate voted to file Senate Bill 125 — an after‑school programs bill establishing state standards and a grant process — after a close roll‑call vote.
SALT LAKE CITY — The Utah Senate on Day 32 rejected a bill that would have established uniform administrative standards and a grant process for after‑school programs targeted at areas with low attendance, low graduation rates and low assessment scores.
Senator Luz Escamilla, sponsor of Senate Bill 125, told the chamber the measure would direct the Department of Workforce Services and the State Board of Education to adopt rules and a grant program for high‑quality after‑school programming, aimed at students in underserved areas. "This specific program will be looking into areas or LEAs that have low graduation rates, low assessment scores, and low attendance rates," Escamilla said on the floor.
Why it mattered: Supporters said the bill would expand access to supervised, skill‑building programs during the critical hours between 3 p.m. and 5 p.m., when many children are unsupervised. Opponents warned it creates an expanding role for state funding and duplicates existing efforts administered by the Utah State Office of Education (USOE) and Department of Workforce Services (DWS).
Funding and administration: Escamilla said the program would be funded through grants administered by USOE in collaboration with DWS and would use grant award processes already in place. "The funding is our own funding... this bill has to be funded in order to take place," she said, adding the rules and assessment tools are drawn from existing best practices and the After School Network.
Key exchanges: Senator Raymond P. Ward and others questioned whether the bill duplicated existing programs and whether local school districts or community organizations already meet the standards. Senator Dayton pressed on the source of funds and said he opposed further taxpayer spending on parenting substitutes: "More before school programs, more pre‑K programs, more after school programs... I'm concerned about how much money we tax away from the taxpayers to pay for these kinds of programs," he said.
Senator Steve D. Debakis offered a lengthy defense of the bill as a targeted anti‑poverty tool, saying the programs would "put our arms around these children and giving them a shot at life." He urged colleagues to focus on outcomes for children in communities with concentrated poverty.
Vote and outcome: After debate the Senate recorded 13 yeas and 11 nays; the clerk announced the measure failed and will be filed. The sponsor said the bill sought to formalize quality standards and make targeted grants available, but supporters were unable to secure the votes needed to advance the proposal.
What’s next: According to sponsors, the bill's concepts are built on existing grant processes and voluntary administrative rulemaking. No further action on this file was recorded during the day's session; the Senate recessed and will revisit other items on its calendar at 2 p.m.
