Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Trust Lands Water Records topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Senate approves SITLA reform bill to clarify trust-land authority and streamline water records

Utah State Senate · February 10, 2016
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

SB 72, described by sponsor Senator Dayton as a SITLA priority, passed the Senate after proponents said it will create order and certainty in state water records, permit certain online processes, and clarify when the SITLA director may withdraw lands for resource degradation or safety. The bill passed 27–0 with two absences.

The Utah Senate passed Senate Bill 72, a priority measure for the State Institutional Trust Lands Administration (SITLA), which sponsors said will modernize certain administrative processes and help ensure accurate water records across the state.

Senator Dayton told the Senate SB 72 allows SITLA to complete some work online, to enter memoranda of understanding with the State Institutional Trust Fund Office (SITFO) where appropriate, and clarifies the conditions under which the SITLA director may withdraw trust lands from surface occupancy or use "if there's problems with resource degradation or safety issues." He described the bill as aimed at creating "order and certainty in the water records throughout the state." (Sen. Dayton)

Senator Jenkins, who said he had reservations early on, said reviewing maps of many abandoned water rights in urbanized areas changed his view. Jenkins argued the bill provides a process to adjudicate and recover abandoned rights and to speed the resolution of complex records issues.

The sponsor moved final passage; the President announced the result as 27 yea votes, 0 nays and 2 absences. The Senate will transmit the bill to the House for the next step.

Supporters characterized SB 72 as an administrative and technical update rather than a policy overhaul; discussion on the floor focused on improving record accuracy and administrative speed for water rights adjudication. No amendments or budgetary appropriations were enacted on the floor during this session.