Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Education Truancy topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Senate passes SB 45 to remove misdemeanor penalty for parental truancy; debate centers on parental rights and due process

Utah State Senate · February 16, 2016
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The Utah Senate voted 24–5 to advance SB 45, a bill by Senator Jackson that removes a class B misdemeanor penalty for parents who fail to ensure children attend school and emphasizes persuasion and supports instead of criminal punishment. Senators debated due process, potential attendance impacts and examples of extreme cases.

Senator Jackson introduced Senate Bill 45 to revise Utah’s compulsory education law by removing a class B misdemeanor penalty for parents who keep children out of school and by shifting enforcement toward persuasion and supportive interventions rather than criminal sanctions. “We should not be threatening a parent with jail time when their children are not attending school,” Jackson said during debate.

Supporters said the current penalty is coercive and can punish families rather than solving underlying problems. Jackson told the Senate he has received constituent reports indicating the statutory threat of criminal sanctions had been used inappropriately and that administrative and school‑level remedies, along with Division of Child and Family Services involvement where abuse is suspected, should be relied on instead.

Opponents warned the change could weaken incentives for attendance and pointed to existing administrative due‑process procedures. Senator Stevenson and others asked how many parents currently face fines or jail time; proponents answered that last year 21 Utahns were jailed and 73 fined in truancy cases during committee consideration, and argued the legislative approach should focus on prevention and improving school environments.

Senators raised specific concerns about cases with extreme family circumstances and asked whether administrative rules (cited in debate as R277‑607.1) and current processes provide sufficient due process before criminal referral. Jackson said those processes are not always working and emphasized that the bill’s intent is not to encourage non‑attendance but to stop criminalizing parents as a first response.

After extended debate, Jackson requested the bill be read for a third time. The Senate recorded a roll‑call result showing 24 yea and 5 nay votes for final passage and moved the bill to its next legislative step.

Next steps: SB 45 was advanced by the Senate and will be transmitted for consideration by the House.