Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Workplace Policy topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Senate approves anti‑discrimination revisions requiring reasonable accommodations for pregnant and nursing workers

Utah State Senate · February 2, 2016
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

After extended floor debate about logistics and industry exemptions, the Utah Senate passed SB 59 adding reasonable‑accommodation protections for pregnant and nursing employees. The sponsor said the bill protects both employees and employers; the final roll call was 18‑9 with 2 absent.

The Utah Senate on the floor passed Senate Bill 59, a revision to the Anti‑Discrimination Act that would require employers to provide reasonable accommodations to pregnant workers and nursing mothers, after extended floor debate about implementation and potential hardships for some employers.

Sponsor Senator Weiler framed the bill as aligning Utah with other states and the District of Columbia that have similar protections, and said it "would require employers to provide reasonable accommodations to pregnant workers and nursing mothers." Opponents on the floor raised logistical concerns: one senator speaking from an employer perspective described staff sizes and lack of private space and said the requirement could be burdensome in small offices, noting concerns about doctors' certificates and operational difficulty.

Senator Weiler responded on the floor that "SB 59 would not require any employer to allow children in the workplace" and that the bill does not obligate employers to construct dedicated rooms; the medical certification referenced in the bill is permissive (employers "may require" a certification). Sponsor and supporters emphasized that employers may deny requests that create an undue hardship, and described typical accommodations as reasonable breaks, seating, or temporary adjustments rather than structural obligations.

Several senators questioned how the bill would apply to specific industries such as mining, where long underground shifts and travel time affect feasibility. The sponsor said employers could deny accommodation requests that posed undue hardship, such as extended travel times in and out of hazardous worksites. After debate and additional supportive floor remarks describing job loss that followed lack of accommodations in at least one case, the Senate recorded the final roll call: "Senate Bill 59 have received 18 yay votes, 9 nay votes, 2 being absent" and the bill passed and will be sent to the House for consideration.

The transcript records floor discussion of practical workplace scenarios and multiple senators emphasizing the bill's intent to balance protections for mothers with reasonable employer limits.