Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Education Funding topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Senate passes school-funding bill after heated debate over redistributing education dollars
Summary
The Utah Senate passed Senate Bill 80 to shift growth in the education fund toward districts with lower property-tax yields. Supporters said it advances equity; opponents warned it will move money away from some urban and inner‑city schools. The bill passed 19–9.
Senate Bill 80, a measure intended to use growth in the state education fund to narrow property‑tax yield disparities among school districts, passed the Utah Senate on Jan. 16 after extended floor debate.
The bill’s sponsor, Senator Fillmore, said the proposal ‘‘seeks property tax yield equity among schools’’ by phasing funding to boost districts that lack local property wealth. He described the change as tying an ongoing increase to statewide growth in education funding rather than one‑time adjustments.
Opponents raised concerns that the proposal would reallocate existing dollars rather than increase the overall education pot. Senator DeBackus said the bill ‘‘takes money from some children and gives it to other children under the rubric of equality and fairness’’ and warned inner‑city schools in her district would lose funding. Senator Hilliard and others also pressed for assurances that the measure would not worsen achievement‑gap funding shortfalls.
Sponsor Fillmore replied that he and his staff have worked with school districts statewide and pledged to continue stakeholder engagement if the bill advanced. He said refinements remain possible as the bill moves through the process.
Senators questioned the interaction between the proposal and the weighted pupil unit (WPU). Some senators suggested indexing changes be phased more slowly or conditioned on a specified WPU increase to preserve baseline funding for all districts.
After floor discussion and recorded explanations of votes, the Senate approved SB80 on a roll‑call vote: 19 yea, 9 nay, 1 absent. The bill will be transmitted to the House for consideration.
The vote followed earlier committee recommendations and substituted language discussed on the floor; senators emphasized the need for further technical work and stakeholder negotiations in subsequent stages of the process.
