Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Criminal Justice topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Senate OKs bill registering residential vocational programs after debate over OtherSide Academy

Utah Senate · March 8, 2018
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The Senate passed first substitute House Bill 468 to define and register residential vocational and life‑skills programs (such as OtherSide Academy). Supporters described it as an alternative to incarceration; critics raised concerns about peer‑counseling models, competition with private businesses and oversight; the bill passed under suspension of rules.

The Utah Senate approved first substitute House Bill 468, which creates a defined registration category for residential vocational and life‑skills programs that do not accept state or federal funding and operate with volunteer‑based agreements.

Senator Vickers, sponsor of the bill, framed it around the OtherSide Academy example: a program that runs market‑rate businesses such as a moving company and a food truck that provide work and training to participants. ‘‘They don’t take money. They don’t take state money. They don’t take federal money,’’ Vickers said, and the bill’s registration would recognize — but not over‑regulate — such programs.

Senator Dayton and other supporters described OtherSide Academy as “an alternative to incarceration,” noting participants generated revenue and reduced incarceration costs. Dayton said, “Their students last year produced close to $2,000,000 in revenue and the state would have had to pay $21,000,000 to incarcerate them for their full sentences,” arguing the model provides fiscal and social returns.

Several senators raised concerns about safeguards and therapy. One senator cautioned that peer‑counseling models do not substitute for clinical therapy for people with severe needs; another questioned whether businesses run by program participants compete unfairly with commercial providers. The bill specifies that qualifying programs must operate without government grants and on a voluntary basis; the fiscal note sponsor cited in debate was small ($2,100).

The Senate moved the bill under suspension of the rules and recorded a roll‑call that carried the measure; it was transmitted to the House for its signature.

What’s next: The bill’s registration and oversight provisions will be implemented by the relevant state agency as defined in the statute; lawmakers and stakeholders signaled intent to monitor whether the law imposes undue burdens on voluntary nonprofit programs or leaves gaps in participant protections.

Sources: Sponsor remarks by Senator Vickers, floor questions and comments by Senators Dayton and Henderson, fiscal note referenced on the floor.