Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Substance Use Treatment Brokers topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Senate debate centers on bill to ban predatory addiction-treatment brokers; some senators question felony penalty

Utah State Senate · March 2, 2018
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

A floor debate focused on a proposal to prohibit brokers who solicit families in crisis and arrange substance use disorder placements for a fee, with the sponsor calling the practice 'predatory' and other senators arguing the proposed third-degree felony penalty may be too severe and requiring more study.

SALT LAKE CITY — Senators on the Utah Senate floor debated a bill aimed at stopping so-called referral brokers who solicit families in crisis and arrange substance use disorder treatment placements in exchange for fees.

The sponsor described the brokers as exploitative, saying the practice “is a predatory practice” that has left families financially liable after brokers arrange out-of-state placements. The sponsor proposed making the conduct a third-degree felony to deter the behavior, and asked colleagues to support the measure.

Several senators questioned whether immediately elevating the conduct to a felony was appropriate. Senator Henderson asked for clarification on penalties and the justification, saying the proposal “seems like a really, really steep penalty” for conduct that is legal in some circumstances today. Henderson and others urged further study of sentencing implications before moving forward.

Senator Filmore and others urged colleagues to consult with the bill sponsor and relevant committees; some senators moved to circulate the bill for further discussion rather than immediately pass it. The Senate did not finalize a felony change on the floor; members opted to pause and seek more information before advancing the measure.

The transcript records the initial sponsor’s description of the practice and multiple floor questions about whether the penalty and statutory approach align with sentencing-commission recommendations. No formal vote to adopt the felony penalty was recorded during the segments covering this debate; senators moved to delay final action pending additional discussion.