Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Public Lands topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Senate backs Central Wasatch Commission resolution after debate over Mountain Accord legacy

Utah Senate · March 8, 2019
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The Senate adopted a first substitute of SCR10 recognizing the Central Wasatch Commission’s work on transportation and watershed protection after several senators warned the resolution could echo disputed elements of the earlier Mountain Accord; the resolution passed 20‑7 and will go to the House.

After extended floor discussion, the Senate approved a first substitute Senate Concurrent Resolution 10 recognizing the Central Wasatch Commission and urging federal support for coordinated transportation and watershed protections.

Sponsor Senator Cullimore framed the resolution as an effort to "keep the ball rolling" toward addressing transportation, conservation and watershed issues and to signal state support when federal legislation is proposed. Several senators, including Senator Hilliard and Senator Andrick, expressed reservations that the resolution may implicitly endorse elements of the earlier Mountain Accord that had not secured unanimous stakeholder buy‑in. "My concern with this is...I don't understand why we need the resolution, because there's nothing in this resolution that we wouldn't already be doing," Senator Andrick said during questioning.

Cullimore and other sponsors stressed the substitute does not lay out specific plans and that its purpose is momentum and consensus building among local governments and stakeholders. After adopting a substitution and a technical amendment that removed a controversial whereas clause, the Senate passed the first substitute 20 yay, 7 nay, 2 absent and the resolution will be transmitted to the House.

Floor debate focused on balance between recognizing coordinated regional planning efforts and avoiding the appearance of endorsing contested past agreements; sponsors said the resolution intends to support transportation planning, watershed protection and tourism benefits while leaving implementation specifics to future processes.