Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Transportation topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Senate debates lane‑filtering bill allowing motorcycles to move between stopped traffic; amendment to lower speed threshold fails

Utah Senate (Second-reading calendar) · February 27, 2019
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Senator Hinkins’ traffic bill defining ‘lane filtering’ for motorcycles drew extended floor discussion about safety and right of way; an amendment to change the speed threshold from 50 mph to 40 mph failed on a division vote and the bill advanced to the third‑reading calendar.

Senator Hinkins presented a House bill to define and temporarily authorize 'lane filtering' by motorcycles when certain conditions are met. The sponsor described the measure as targeted to low‑speed situations where a stopped vehicle could pose a hazard to a motorcycle: "It allows filtering if a motorcycle is overtaking a vehicle that is stopped in the same lane of travel." The bill sets several conditions: the roadway must have two or more adjacent lanes in the same direction, the road's posted speed limit must be 50 miles per hour or less, a vehicle being overtaken must be stopped, and the motorcycle must be traveling at 15 miles per hour or less and be able to make the movement safely.

Senator Harper moved to amend the bill by replacing the number 50 with 40 (i.e., limit lane filtering to roads with posted speed limits of 40 mph or less). Senator Harper argued the lower number better targets the low‑speed urban streets where the movement is safer. The motion to amend proceeded to division; the transcript records 11 senators standing in favor and 12 opposed, and the presiding officer ruled the motion fails after counting (the motion ultimately failed on the division).

Lawmakers exchanged questions about real‑world scenarios, including the right‑of‑way when a motorcycle passes a stopped car and how filtering would interact with groups of motorcycles at a signal. Supporters argued lane filtering helps traffic flow and reduces risk of being 'squished' between cars, while opponents warned it could introduce new hazards in dense urban areas.

The Senate then proceeded with a roll call and the bill was read for a third time; the transcript records the recorded roll call and the bill was advanced on the floor to the third‑reading calendar after the recorded vote.