Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Child Welfare topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Senate narrows child-welfare language on medical cannabis after circling the bill
Summary
Senators circled then passed a third substitute of House Bill 365 clarifying how parental use of cannabis figures into child‑welfare proceedings; floor debate centered on protecting families while ensuring courts can act when children face harm.
The Senate took up third substitute House Bill 365, a bill that narrows and clarifies how parental cannabis use factors into determinations of child abuse, neglect and endangerment in child‑welfare proceedings. Concerned senators said new language had not been vetted in a Senate committee and feared it could remove criminal penalties; sponsors and supporters said the change was limited to child‑welfare proceedings and intended to prevent unnecessary family separation when no harm occurred.
Senator Fillmore raised the example of court actions taken in a case where a parent with a medical cannabis card lost custody; sponsor senators said the bill aims to correct inconsistent application by courts and to ensure judges apply policy lawmakers adopted in prior sessions. Several senators moved to circle the bill for sponsor‑stakeholder negotiation; the sponsor accepted the circle and later reported clarifying changes. After floor discussion and a final roll-call the chamber passed the third substitute, with the clerk reporting 24 yeas, 0 nays, 5 absent, and the bill returned to the House for further consideration.
Floor debate repeatedly distinguished between child‑welfare proceedings and criminal penalties for conduct that causes harm; sponsors said the measure does not remove criminal liability where harm or threatened harm is present and instead provides guidance for family‑law determinations. Members requested follow-up to monitor court applications of the law.
