Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Pretrial Reform topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Senate passes HB206 to expand judges' pretrial tools beyond cash bail

Utah State Senate · March 11, 2020
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The Utah Senate approved House Bill 206, which preserves monetary bail but directs judges to use the least restrictive, reasonably available conditions to ensure appearance and public-safety goals, after proponents cited wide support from prosecutors, sheriffs and civil-rights groups.

The Utah Senate passed third substitute House Bill 206 on voice and roll-call votes after a sustained floor debate that framed the measure as an effort to modernize pretrial decision-making.

Sponsor Senator Wyler said the bill "preserves monetary bail as a condition of release, but also expands the tools available to judges to adequately address an individual's public safety risk," and listed endorsements from the Statewide Association of Prosecutors, the Sheriffs Association, chiefs of police, the Judicial Council, CCJJ, the Utah State Bar, the Criminal Defense Attorneys Association, the Utah Association of Counties, Americans for Prosperity and the ACLU.

Why it matters: Supporters argued that Utah’s prevailing cash-bail practice relies on offense categories rather than individual risk and disproportionately penalizes low-income defendants. The sponsor told senators that "63% of the inmates in Salt Lake County and over half of the inmates statewide are pretrial detainees," and that holding people pretrial can cost taxpayers about "$80 to $110 per day." Those figures were offered to illustrate the bill’s fiscal and fairness implications.

Key provisions and safeguards: The bill instructs judges to choose the least restrictive reasonably available conditions necessary to: secure a defendant’s appearance in court; protect public safety; protect witnesses and victims; and preserve the integrity of court processes. Senator Wyler emphasized that "this bill makes no change to cash bonds" and that cash bail remains an option where appropriate.

Exchanges on the floor: Senators pressed for clarity about when non-monetary conditions would be used. Senator Kitchen asked for concrete examples; the sponsor answered that a judge might use ankle monitors, mandatory drug testing or supervision for a low-risk defendant with strong local ties while reserving cash bail for defendants deemed a flight or public-safety risk. Senator Hilliard described how deputies currently set bonds from a schedule and how those amounts can impose burdens on families.

Vote and next steps: Under suspension of the rules the Senate read HB206 for a second and third time and passed it by roll call. The clerk recorded 25 yea votes, 1 nay and 3 absent; the bill will be returned to the House for the speaker’s signature and then to the governor for final action.

The bill’s implementation will depend on judicial practice and any administrative tools the courts adopt to operationalize individualized risk assessments and alternatives to cash bail.