Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Healthcare Immunity topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Utah Senate Concurrs with House on Emergency Health‑Care Immunity Amendments, Passes SB 3002
Summary
The Utah Senate voted to concur with House amendments to SB 3002, clarifying notification language and removing a narrowly redundant immunity provision; the measure passed the Senate 27–0 and will return to the House for the speaker's signature.
The Utah Senate on Friday agreed to House amendments to Senate Bill 3002, an emergency health‑care access and immunity measure addressing legal protections and notification requirements tied to the COVID‑19 response. Senator Vickers moved the concurrence and described two House changes: clarified language on notification procedures and removal of a provision that would have extended immunity in a circumstance already covered by existing medical‑immunity law.
In explaining the amendments, Vickers said the House rewrote a notification fee provision so that required notifications “can take place without necessarily being in writing,” and incorporated drafting suggestions from Senator Christensen about documentation in medical charts. The House also removed lines 91–100 that the drafters concluded were unnecessary because the individuals in the described situation would already fall under the medical immunity statute.
Senator Luz Escamilla, who voted yes, said she appreciated the sponsor’s work to address concerns raised by disability advocates but warned against “blanket immunity.” She said the bill does not remove providers’ existing responsibilities and that she would continue monitoring implementation: “I just…think a blanket immunity, even under a pandemic situation, should not be based on the current care that needs to happen,” she said.
Senators raised technical questions about whether EMTs and other practitioners are covered; the sponsor and drafting attorney said those providers acting under their facility and practice guidelines would be covered by the immunity provisions as drafted. After a roll call, the president announced SB 3002 had passed the Senate by recorded vote, 27–0, with two senators absent. The bill will be returned to the House for the speaker’s signature.
The Senate took the action as part of its virtual special session work related to pandemic response; senators also discussed other pandemic‑related legislation during the day.
