Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Tax Policy topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Senate advances bill allowing counties to itemize animal-control charges on property tax notices

Utah State Senate · February 8, 2021
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

A bill that would let counties show a separate line on property tax bills for animal-control services was substituted on the Senate floor and advanced to third reading after supporters said it improves transparency while opponents warned it could enable a new local levy if counties choose to 'open the door.'

The Utah State Senate on the floor substituted and advanced Senate Bill 104, a measure allowing counties to break out a distinct line on property tax notices showing charges for animal-control services.

Senator Weiler, sponsor of SB104, told colleagues the bill "does not raise taxes" but would let counties "break it out on your tax bill" so residents can see the portion that funds animal-control services. He said stakeholders asked to opt out counties of the first class, including Salt Lake County, where local practice differs.

Supporters said the change improves transparency by showing on the property tax statement what portion of the tax notice covers animal control, similar to existing line items for library or mosquito-abatement districts. Senator Weiler said the statutory change "opens that door" for counties that wish to use the mechanism, but added any county would still need to go through truth-in-taxation hearings before imposing any new levy.

Senator Winterton and others questioned whether the bill creates a new tax or merely an accounting change; Senator Weiler replied the statute creates the mechanism but does not itself impose a new levy.

The Senate voted by roll call on the substituted measure. The clerk reported "Second substitute Senate Bill 104 having received 23 yay votes, 0 nay votes, 6 being absent" and the bill was ordered read a third time.

The bill will proceed to the next calendar step for third-reading consideration and any further floor action.